Going through the City's budget history tells us all we need to understand about Measure T and those trying to push it through. Several folks, including Council members, have complained about declining revenues and having to take from the reserve. But looking at the numbers since 1998 tells a completely different story. You see, the City's budget has done nothing but grow.....and grow....AND GROW.  And the City has spent....and spent....AND SPENT:

 Year          Revenue         Spending
1998         $11.8 mil         $9.6 mil 
1999         $12.6               $9.7
2000         $14.5               $10.5
2001         $16.6               $11.2
2002        $15.9                $13.4
2003        $16.0                $13.9
2004        $16.1                $14.7
2005        $17.1                $15.6
2006        $18.7                $16.0
2007        $20.4                $17.5
2008        $30.9                $29.3
2009        $28.3                $28.2

AND NOW THEY WANT MORE. LET'S TELL THEM NO!
 
Cell phone service is taxed, Pleasant Hill admits
By Lisa P. White
Contra Costa Times
Posted: 10/03/2010 12:00:00 AM PDT


PLEASANT HILL -- For months, Pleasant Hill has been telling residents the city charges a utility tax only on landline telephone service.

But city leaders acknowledged last week, and several residents' wireless bills prove, that cell phone service also is taxed.

A July 19 city staff report stated that Pleasant Hill levies the existing 1 percent utility tax on intrastate, landline phone service only. The 1983 ordinance, however, says the tax applies to intrastate telephone service.

"Not everybody is as familiar with the language of the ordinance as others, and somehow that got slipped in (the staff report) that it applied to landlines only, and that's not correct," City Attorney Debra Margolis said.

The city has spread the same incorrect utility tax information in other ways. The September-October issue of the Outlook city newsletter repeated the claim that, currently, only landline phone service is taxed. That information also appeared in two places on the Pleasant Hill website until city staff members corrected it about two weeks ago.

And Redevelopment Agency administrator Bob Stewart's statement during a July 19 presentation to the council shows some city staff members didn't know Pleasant Hill is collecting tax revenue on cell phone service.

"The advantages of the (utility users tax) include expanding it to treat all taxpayers equally," Stewart said July 19. "For example, those residents using only landline telephones are subject to the current (users tax), while those using mobile phones are not."

At that meeting, the City Council voted to place Measure T on the ballot. Measure T would raise the tax to 1.5 percent and expand it to most utilities, including cable, electricity, gas, water and sewer bills.

Questions about whether Pleasant Hill taxes cell phone service arose during a Sept. 22 election forum, when council candidate Jack Weir -- who opposes the tax hike -- asked the incumbents to explain why the city utility tax appeared on his AT&T Wireless bill.

Wireless companies have for many years interpreted older utility tax ordinances, such as Pleasant Hill's, to apply to cell phone service, said Verizon spokeswoman Heidi Flato. She could not say when the company started charging Pleasant Hill residents the utility tax, but she said it probably has been levied since the company was created in 2000.

Weir later said he was disappointed to learn the city had misinformed voters.

"They should be better about doing their homework. That's the root of this problem," Weir said. "This is just very sloppy staff work, pure and simple. They made a statement that is patently untrue."

According to Margolis and City Manager June Catalano, the estimates of the revenue the city collects now from the utility tax and the projections for future revenue, if voters approve Measure T, are accurate.

On Thursday, Margolis and Catalano said they didn't think the city needed to act to get the right information about the utility tax to voters before the election.

"We're not sure what to correct because there's no effect, it doesn't change anything," Margolis said. "We have communicated to the voters that we currently tax intrastate telephone services, so why is it so important that voters understand that it applies to both landlines and cell phones?"

But in an e-mail Friday, Catalano said the city apologizes for any confusion, and that a "clarifying statement" will be made at Monday's council meeting.

Kris Hunt, executive director of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, said she is disturbed that the city changed the website without acknowledging the mistake.

"This makes everybody nervous about government," said Hunt, whose organization opposes Measure T. "That's the wrong way to handle it. They should be daylighting this. They should have explained, 'Yes we've given you wrong information.' "

Lisa P. White covers Martinez and Pleasant Hill. Contact her at 925-943-8011. Follow her at Twitter.com/lisa_p_white.

 
Please join us at the City Council hearing this coming Monday, October 4 at 7:30pm. Be sure to print out a sign to bring! We hope to be there in force to voice our opposition to Measure T!
 
Some say Pleasant Hill Managers' Contract Misses Cost-cutting Opportunities By Lisa P. White
Contra Costa Times


Posted: 09/17/2010 06:55:26 PM PDT
Updated: 09/21/2010 05:20:09 PM PDT


PLEASANT HILL -- The recently approved contract with the city's management employees doesn't include a raise.

That's good news for Pleasant Hill, where sales tax revenue is shrinking and budget deficits are looming.

But critics say the city missed an opportunity to cut spending, because the contract doesn't require employees to pay into retirement or raise health care premiums -- two of the biggest budget busters.

Some residents find this especially galling because the city is asking voters to increase the utility tax. Residents point to Walnut Creek and Concord, which both have much larger deficits than Pleasant Hill, where employees have accepted pay cuts or agreed to make retirement contributions.

The days of generous benefits packages for public employees are over, critics say.

"At some point you have to say, 'Stop, this can't go on this way, or we're going to go broke,' " said Kevin Gregory, who opposes the utility tax hike.

Before negotiations with the 17 management employees began, the city formed a committee, including representatives of the four bargaining groups, to talk about ways to cut heath care costs. The committee discussed a range of options, including raising premiums and changing insurers or health plans, according to Mike Nielsen, a representative of the management employees.

The management group received a 4 percent cost-of-living increase in 2009. Nielsen, Pleasant Hill's chief building official, said they agreed to forego a raise this year because of the "economic times."

City Manager June Catalano said everything will be on the table when the management group enters negotiations again in March.

Personnel costs consume about 70 percent of the city's general fund. Pleasant Hill paid about $1.4 million for health care premiums and $840,000 to cover employees' CalPERS contributions in the 2009 fiscal year, according to Mary McCarthy, finance director. City staffers began paying a portion of their health care premiums in 2006, and now pay $55 per month for family medical coverage. 

 (Note - the $840,000 mentioned above goes to pay the EMPLOYEES contribution to CalPERS. This is in addition to contributions paid solely by the City to CalPERS...) - Editor



Nielsen declined to comment on residents' suggestion that employees pay a greater share of the tab for their retirement and health insurance benefits.


Pleasant Hill leaders note the city has cut spending -- the most recent budget froze 22 vacant positions, including several top management posts.

The contract the police officers ratified last year ties raises to the city meeting revenue targets, which didn't happen.

Still, Councilwoman Terri Williamson, who is running for re-election, said the city must do more, and that could include employee contributions to pensions and health care.

But she acknowledged the difficulty of asking employees to take what amounts to a pay cut during a recession, particularly since the city expects to have a $9.4 million reserve fund at the end of fiscal year 2011-12.

Councilman Michael Harris, also seeking re-election, agreed heath care and pensions must be discussed at next year's contract talks.

"I would like to see if we can come up with a way of getting these ever-increasing costs under control. I don't know what the answer is going to be," he said.

The management contract includes perks such as monthly car allowances of several hundred dollars and up to $1,500 to buy a computer or other technology every two years.

Click here for the story.